Ryzen 7 9700X + RTX 5090 in S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2

Every figure below is a measurement aggregated from published review charts — the CPU's frame-rate ceiling and the frame rate the GPU delivers in this game, combined. The CPU figure is the highest frame rate that CPU sustained in this game with a flagship GPU installed — past that frame rate, the CPU is the limit. Settings: Epic preset, render scale 100% (native, no upscaling). CPU ceiling measured at 1080p, highest settings (TechPowerUp CPU suite), RTX 5090.

1080p82–82 fps · Strong CPU limit1440p82–82 fps · Mild CPU limit4K81–81 fps · Balanced pairing

1080p

Strong CPU limit

Expected frame rate: 82–82 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 7 9700Xceiling ~82 fps on its own
GPU RTX 5090delivers ~144 fps in this game at 1080p

The CPU side is lower by about 43.2% in this game at 1080p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~82 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (144 − 82) ÷ 144 ≈ 43.2% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

1440p

Mild CPU limit

Expected frame rate: 82–82 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 7 9700Xceiling ~82 fps on its own
GPU RTX 5090delivers ~118 fps in this game at 1440p

The CPU side is lower by about 30.7% in this game at 1440p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~82 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (118 − 82) ÷ 118 ≈ 30.7% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

4K

Balanced pairing

Expected frame rate: 81–81 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 7 9700Xceiling ~82 fps on its own
GPU RTX 5090delivers ~81 fps in this game at 4K

The CPU ceiling and the GPU's delivered rate sit within 1.0% of each other — neither part wastes much of the other. The gap is measured between the two figures above: (faster − slower) ÷ faster.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

No CPU measured in this game fully clears this GPU - the strongest measured option:

This pair in other games

Sources for S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2

Full data: S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 benchmarks · how verdicts are computed.