Core Ultra 7 265K + RTX 5070 Ti in Marvel's Spider-Man 2

Every figure below is a measurement aggregated from published review charts — the CPU's frame-rate ceiling and the frame rate the GPU delivers in this game, combined. The CPU figure is the highest frame rate that CPU sustained in this game with a flagship GPU installed — past that frame rate, the CPU is the limit. Settings: Max preset, no ray tracing, upscaling off. CPU ceiling measured at 1080p, highest settings (TechPowerUp CPU suite), RTX 5090; Ryzen 5 5600X from Hardware Unboxed's AM4 revisit at its Medium CPU-isolation preset.

1080p156–156 fps · Balanced pairing 1440p131–131 fps · Mild GPU limit 4K73–73 fps · Strong GPU limit

1080p

Balanced pairing

Expected frame rate: 156–156 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Core Ultra 7 265Kceiling ~156 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5070 Tidelivers ~174 fps in this game at 1080p

The CPU ceiling and the GPU's delivered rate sit within 10.7% of each other — neither part wastes much of the other. The gap is measured between the two figures above: (faster − slower) ÷ faster.

That range justifies a 144 Hz monitor in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

1440p

Mild GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 131–131 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Core Ultra 7 265Kceiling ~156 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5070 Tidelivers ~131 fps in this game at 1440p

The GPU side is lower by about 16.0% in this game at 1440p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~131 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (156 − 131) ÷ 156 ≈ 16.0% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range justifies a 144 Hz monitor in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

4K

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 73–73 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Core Ultra 7 265Kceiling ~156 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5070 Tidelivers ~73 fps in this game at 4K

The GPU side is lower by about 53.0% in this game at 4K. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~73 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (156 − 73) ÷ 156 ≈ 53.0% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

GPUs measured in this game at 1440p that clear this CPU:

RTX 4090 — delivers ~163 fps (smallest step that removes the limit) · full result
RTX 5090 — delivers ~192 fps (strongest measured) · full result

This pair in other games

Alan Wake 2 — Strong GPU limit, 93–93 fps at 1440p
Baldur's Gate 3 — Estimated: Strong CPU limit, ~104–104 fps at 1440p (labelled estimate)
Counter-Strike 2 — Strong GPU limit, 360–360 fps at 1440p
Cyberpunk 2077 — Balanced, 108–111 fps at 1440p
Elden Ring — Mild CPU limit, 139–139 fps at 1440p
Kingdom Come: Deliverance II — Mild GPU limit, 124–124 fps at 1440p
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 — Balanced, 84–84 fps at 1440p
Starfield — Strong GPU limit, 93–93 fps at 1440p

Sources for Marvel's Spider-Man 2

Full data: Marvel's Spider-Man 2 benchmarks · how verdicts are computed.