Ryzen 7 3700X + RX 9070 GRE in Starfield

Every figure below is a measurement aggregated from published review charts — the CPU's frame-rate ceiling and the GPU's frame-rate ceiling in this game, combined. Settings: Ultra preset, native rendering, no upscaling, no frame generation. CPU ceiling measured at 1080p, Low preset (reviewers' CPU-isolation method), flagship GPU.

1080p

Balanced pairing

Expected frame rate: 69–93 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 7 3700Xceiling ~69–93 fps on its own
GPU RX 9070 GREceiling ~95 fps on its own

The two measured ceilings sit within 14.9% of each other — neither part wastes much of the other.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: LOW — based on 3 source measurements for these two parts.

1440p

Balanced pairing

Expected frame rate: 69–79 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 7 3700Xceiling ~69–93 fps on its own
GPU RX 9070 GREceiling ~79 fps on its own

The two measured ceilings sit within 3.0% of each other — neither part wastes much of the other.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: LOW — based on 3 source measurements for these two parts.

4K

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 51–51 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 7 3700Xceiling ~69–93 fps on its own
GPU RX 9070 GREceiling ~51 fps on its own

The GPU side is lower by about 36.6%: the pair runs at the lower ceiling, and upgrading the other part alone would not raise it.

That range sits under a smooth 60 in this game at the tested preset — expect to trade settings for frame rate.

Confidence: LOW — based on 3 source measurements for these two parts.

This pair in other measured games

Sources for Starfield

Full data: Starfield benchmarks · how verdicts are computed.