Core Ultra 5 250K Plus + RTX 4070 Ti Super in Starfield

Every figure below is a measurement aggregated from published review charts — the CPU's frame-rate ceiling and the GPU's frame-rate ceiling in this game, combined. Settings: Ultra preset, native rendering, no upscaling, no frame generation. CPU ceiling measured at 1080p, Low preset (reviewers' CPU-isolation method), flagship GPU.

1080p

Mild GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 109–109 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Core Ultra 5 250K Plusceiling ~147 fps on its own
GPU RTX 4070 Ti Superceiling ~109 fps on its own

The GPU side is lower by about 25.6%: the pair runs at the lower ceiling, and upgrading the other part alone would not raise it.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

1440p

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 90–90 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Core Ultra 5 250K Plusceiling ~147 fps on its own
GPU RTX 4070 Ti Superceiling ~90 fps on its own

The GPU side is lower by about 38.3%: the pair runs at the lower ceiling, and upgrading the other part alone would not raise it.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

4K

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 60–60 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Core Ultra 5 250K Plusceiling ~147 fps on its own
GPU RTX 4070 Ti Superceiling ~60 fps on its own

The GPU side is lower by about 58.7%: the pair runs at the lower ceiling, and upgrading the other part alone would not raise it.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

This pair in other measured games

Sources for Starfield

Full data: Starfield benchmarks · how verdicts are computed.