Ryzen 9 9950X3D + RTX 5090 in S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2

Every figure below is a measurement aggregated from published review charts — the CPU's frame-rate ceiling and the frame rate the GPU delivers in this game, combined. The CPU figure is the highest frame rate that CPU sustained in this game with a flagship GPU installed — past that frame rate, the CPU is the limit. Settings: Epic preset, render scale 100% (native, no upscaling). CPU ceiling measured at 1080p, highest settings (TechPowerUp CPU suite), RTX 5090.

1080p

Mild CPU limit

Expected frame rate: 97–97 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 9 9950X3Dceiling ~97 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5090delivers ~144 fps in this game at 1080p

The CPU side is lower by about 32.8% in this game at 1080p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~97 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (144 − 97) ÷ 144 ≈ 32.8% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

1440p

Mild CPU limit

Expected frame rate: 97–97 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 9 9950X3Dceiling ~97 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5090delivers ~118 fps in this game at 1440p

The CPU side is lower by about 18.0% in this game at 1440p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~97 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (118 − 97) ÷ 118 ≈ 18.0% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

4K

Mild GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 81–81 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 9 9950X3Dceiling ~97 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5090delivers ~81 fps in this game at 4K

The GPU side is lower by about 16.3% in this game at 4K. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~81 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (97 − 81) ÷ 97 ≈ 16.3% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

This pair in other games

• Alan Wake 2 — Mild GPU limit, 156–156 fps at 1440p
• Baldur's Gate 3 — this pair has figures there at other resolutions.
• Counter-Strike 2 — Mild GPU limit, 579–579 fps at 1440p
• Cyberpunk 2077 — Mild CPU limit, 140–141 fps at 1440p
• Elden Ring — only your GPU has a figure there so far.
• Kingdom Come: Deliverance II — Balanced, 186–186 fps at 1440p
• Marvel's Spider-Man 2 — Balanced, 176–176 fps at 1440p
• Starfield — Mild GPU limit, 134–134 fps at 1440p

Sources for S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2

• TechPowerUp

Full data: S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 benchmarks · how verdicts are computed.