Neither a measured verdict nor a direct benchmark covers every figure on this page, so the pair figures below are labelled estimates: calculated from this game's measured results (the measured CPU ceilings and GPU results on the Elden Ring benchmarks page), each with its confidence level and the measured parts it is interpolated between. Estimates are badged and styled differently from measured verdicts, and are never presented as measurements. Settings: Highest settings (TechPowerUp RTX 5090 review suite), framerate cap removed - the shipped game caps at 60 fps. CPU ceiling measured at 1080p, highest settings (TechPowerUp CPU suite), RTX 4090, framerate cap removed.
Estimated: Mild CPU limit
Estimated frame rate: ~147–187 fps (calculated range, not a measured one).
On the estimated figures, the CPU side is lower by about 17.2% in this game at 1080p. The math, from the two figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~167 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (202 − 167) ÷ 202 ≈ 17.2% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts.
That range feeds a 165 Hz or faster monitor — this is high-refresh territory in this game.
Estimate — calculated from 23 measured results in this game, not a direct measurement. Confidence: MEDIUM. The CPU figure is interpolated between Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core i9-14900K — the nearest measured CPUs in this game. If reviewers publish a benchmark for the estimated part, a measured verdict replaces this estimate. How estimates work.
Estimated: Mild CPU limit
Estimated frame rate: ~147–187 fps (calculated range, not a measured one).
On the estimated figures, the CPU side is lower by about 15.3% in this game at 1440p. The math, from the two figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~167 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (197 − 167) ÷ 197 ≈ 15.3% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts.
That range feeds a 165 Hz or faster monitor — this is high-refresh territory in this game.
Estimate — calculated from 23 measured results in this game, not a direct measurement. Confidence: MEDIUM. The CPU figure is interpolated between Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core i9-14900K — the nearest measured CPUs in this game. If reviewers publish a benchmark for the estimated part, a measured verdict replaces this estimate. How estimates work.
Estimated: Mild GPU limit
Estimated frame rate: ~134–134 fps (calculated range, not a measured one).
On the estimated figures, the GPU side is lower by about 19.7% in this game at 4K. The math, from the two figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~134 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (167 − 134) ÷ 167 ≈ 19.7% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts.
That range justifies a 144 Hz monitor in this game.
Estimate — calculated from 23 measured results in this game, not a direct measurement. Confidence: MEDIUM. The CPU figure is interpolated between Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core i9-14900K — the nearest measured CPUs in this game. If reviewers publish a benchmark for the estimated part, a measured verdict replaces this estimate. How estimates work.
No CPU measured in this game fully clears this GPU - the strongest measured option:
The pairing figure these options are compared against is the estimate in the card above; every option listed is a measured part.
Full data: Elden Ring benchmarks · how verdicts are computed.