Neither a measured verdict nor a direct benchmark covers every figure on this page, so the pair figures below are labelled estimates: calculated from this game's measured results (the measured CPU ceilings and GPU results on the Counter-Strike 2 benchmarks page), each with its confidence level and the measured parts it is interpolated between. Estimates are badged and styled differently from measured verdicts, and are never presented as measurements. Settings: Highest settings (TechPowerUp RTX 5090 review suite), Ryzen 7 9800X3D. CPU ceiling measured at 1080p, highest settings (TechPowerUp CPU suite), RTX 5090; Ryzen 5 5600X from Hardware Unboxed's AM4 revisit (Very High preset).
Estimated: Strong GPU limit
Estimated frame rate: ~323–505 fps (calculated range, not a measured one).
On the estimated figures, the GPU side is lower by about 37.1% in this game at 1080p. The math, from the two figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~414 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (658 − 414) ÷ 658 ≈ 37.1% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts.
That range feeds a 165 Hz or faster monitor — this is high-refresh territory in this game.
Estimate — calculated from 29 measured results in this game, not a direct measurement. Confidence: LOW. The GPU figure is interpolated between RTX 5070 and RTX 3090 — the nearest measured GPUs in this game. If reviewers publish a benchmark for the estimated part, a measured verdict replaces this estimate. How estimates work.
Estimated: Strong GPU limit
Estimated frame rate: ~174–388 fps (calculated range, not a measured one).
On the estimated figures, the GPU side is lower by about 57.2% in this game at 1440p. The math, from the two figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~281 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (658 − 281) ÷ 658 ≈ 57.2% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts.
That range feeds a 165 Hz or faster monitor — this is high-refresh territory in this game.
Estimate — calculated from 29 measured results in this game, not a direct measurement. Confidence: LOW. The GPU figure is anchored on RTX 4070 Ti, the measured part at the same point on our performance index. If reviewers publish a benchmark for the estimated part, a measured verdict replaces this estimate. How estimates work.
Estimated: Strong GPU limit
Estimated frame rate: ~90–201 fps (calculated range, not a measured one).
On the estimated figures, the GPU side is lower by about 77.9% in this game at 4K. The math, from the two figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~146 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (658 − 146) ÷ 658 ≈ 77.9% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts.
That range justifies a 144 Hz monitor in this game.
Estimate — calculated from 29 measured results in this game, not a direct measurement. Confidence: LOW. The GPU figure is interpolated between RTX 4070 Ti and RTX 3090 — the nearest measured GPUs in this game. If reviewers publish a benchmark for the estimated part, a measured verdict replaces this estimate. How estimates work.
No GPU measured in this game at 1440p fully clears this CPU - the strongest measured option:
The pairing figure these options are compared against is the estimate in the card above; every option listed is a measured part.
Full data: Counter-Strike 2 benchmarks · how verdicts are computed.