Ryzen 5 5600X + RTX 5070 Ti in Counter-Strike 2

Every figure below is a measurement aggregated from published review charts — the CPU's frame-rate ceiling and the frame rate the GPU delivers in this game, combined. The CPU figure is the highest frame rate that CPU sustained in this game with a flagship GPU installed — past that frame rate, the CPU is the limit. Settings: Highest settings (TechPowerUp RTX 5090 review suite), Ryzen 7 9800X3D. CPU ceiling measured at 1080p, highest settings (TechPowerUp CPU suite), RTX 5090; Ryzen 5 5600X from Hardware Unboxed's AM4 revisit (Very High preset).

1080p

Strong CPU limit

Expected frame rate: 290–290 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 5 5600Xceiling ~290 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5070 Tidelivers ~505 fps in this game at 1080p

The CPU side is lower by about 42.6% in this game at 1080p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~290 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (505 − 290) ÷ 505 ≈ 42.6% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range feeds a 165 Hz or faster monitor — this is high-refresh territory in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

1440p

Mild CPU limit

Expected frame rate: 290–290 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 5 5600Xceiling ~290 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5070 Tidelivers ~360 fps in this game at 1440p

The CPU side is lower by about 19.5% in this game at 1440p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~290 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (360 − 290) ÷ 360 ≈ 19.5% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range feeds a 165 Hz or faster monitor — this is high-refresh territory in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

4K

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 192–192 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 5 5600Xceiling ~290 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5070 Tidelivers ~192 fps in this game at 4K

The GPU side is lower by about 33.8% in this game at 4K. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~192 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (290 − 192) ÷ 290 ≈ 33.8% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range feeds a 165 Hz or faster monitor — this is high-refresh territory in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

This pair in other games

• Alan Wake 2 — only your GPU has a figure there so far.
• Baldur's Gate 3 — Estimated: Strong CPU limit, ~82–82 fps at 1440p (labelled estimate)
• Cyberpunk 2077 — Balanced, 108–127 fps at 1440p
• Elden Ring — only your GPU has a figure there so far.
• Kingdom Come: Deliverance II — Mild GPU limit, 124–124 fps at 1440p
• Marvel's Spider-Man 2 — Balanced, 131–131 fps at 1440p
• S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 — only your GPU has a figure there so far.
• Starfield — Balanced, 78–93 fps at 1440p

Sources for Counter-Strike 2

• Hardware Unboxed via TechSpot
• TechPowerUp

Full data: Counter-Strike 2 benchmarks · how verdicts are computed.