Core Ultra 9 285K + RTX 5060 Ti 8GB in Counter-Strike 2

Every figure below is a measurement aggregated from published review charts — the CPU's frame-rate ceiling and the frame rate the GPU delivers in this game, combined. The CPU figure is the highest frame rate that CPU sustained in this game with a flagship GPU installed — past that frame rate, the CPU is the limit. Settings: Highest settings (TechPowerUp RTX 5090 review suite), Ryzen 7 9800X3D. CPU ceiling measured at 1080p, highest settings (TechPowerUp CPU suite), RTX 5090; Ryzen 5 5600X from Hardware Unboxed's AM4 revisit (Very High preset).

1080p

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 311–311 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Core Ultra 9 285Kceiling ~600 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5060 Ti 8GBdelivers ~311 fps in this game at 1080p

The GPU side is lower by about 48.1% in this game at 1080p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~311 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (600 − 311) ÷ 600 ≈ 48.1% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range feeds a 165 Hz or faster monitor — this is high-refresh territory in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

1440p

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 205–205 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Core Ultra 9 285Kceiling ~600 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5060 Ti 8GBdelivers ~205 fps in this game at 1440p

The GPU side is lower by about 65.8% in this game at 1440p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~205 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (600 − 205) ÷ 600 ≈ 65.8% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range feeds a 165 Hz or faster monitor — this is high-refresh territory in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

4K

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 108–108 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Core Ultra 9 285Kceiling ~600 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5060 Ti 8GBdelivers ~108 fps in this game at 4K

The GPU side is lower by about 82.0% in this game at 4K. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~108 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (600 − 108) ÷ 600 ≈ 82.0% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

This pair in other games

• Alan Wake 2 — Strong GPU limit, 55–55 fps at 1440p
• Baldur's Gate 3 — Balanced, 104–104 fps at 1440p
• Cyberpunk 2077 — Mild GPU limit, 77–77 fps at 1440p
• Elden Ring — Mild GPU limit, 111–111 fps at 1440p
• Kingdom Come: Deliverance II — Strong GPU limit, 74–74 fps at 1440p
• Marvel's Spider-Man 2 — Strong GPU limit, 57–57 fps at 1440p
• S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 — Strong GPU limit, 49–49 fps at 1440p
• Starfield — Strong GPU limit, 58–58 fps at 1440p

Sources for Counter-Strike 2

• Hardware Unboxed via TechSpot
• TechPowerUp

Full data: Counter-Strike 2 benchmarks · how verdicts are computed.