Ryzen 9 7950X + RTX 5060 Ti 16GB in Alan Wake 2

Every figure below is a measurement aggregated from published review charts — the CPU's frame-rate ceiling and the frame rate the GPU delivers in this game, combined. The CPU figure is the highest frame rate that CPU sustained in this game with a flagship GPU installed — past that frame rate, the CPU is the limit. Settings: Max settings, no ray tracing, no upscaling. CPU ceiling measured at 1080p, highest settings (TechPowerUp CPU suite), RTX 5090.

1080p

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 75–75 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 9 7950Xceiling ~178 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5060 Ti 16GBdelivers ~75 fps in this game at 1080p

The GPU side is lower by about 57.8% in this game at 1080p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~75 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (178 − 75) ÷ 178 ≈ 57.8% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range suits a 60 Hz monitor; a high-refresh panel would be underused in this game.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

1440p

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 54–54 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 9 7950Xceiling ~178 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5060 Ti 16GBdelivers ~54 fps in this game at 1440p

The GPU side is lower by about 69.5% in this game at 1440p. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~54 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (178 − 54) ÷ 178 ≈ 69.5% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range sits under a smooth 60 in this game at the tested preset — expect to trade settings for frame rate.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

4K

Strong GPU limit

Expected frame rate: 30–30 fps (measured range across sources).

CPU Ryzen 9 7950Xceiling ~178 fps on its own

GPU RTX 5060 Ti 16GBdelivers ~30 fps in this game at 4K

The GPU side is lower by about 82.8% in this game at 4K. The math, from the two measured figures above: the pair runs at the lower one (~30 fps), and the gap to the faster side is (178 − 30) ÷ 178 ≈ 82.8% of the faster side's output. That percentage belongs to this game, this resolution and these settings only — the same two parts score differently in another game, which is why no universal bottleneck percentage exists for a pair of parts. Upgrading the faster part alone would not raise the frame rate.

That range sits under a smooth 60 in this game at the tested preset — expect to trade settings for frame rate.

Confidence: MEDIUM — based on 2 source measurements for these two parts.

This pair in other games

• Baldur's Gate 3 — Balanced, 98–98 fps at 1440p
• Counter-Strike 2 — Strong GPU limit, 204–204 fps at 1440p
• Cyberpunk 2077 — Estimated: Mild GPU limit, ~77–77 fps at 1440p (labelled estimate)
• Elden Ring — Mild GPU limit, 110–110 fps at 1440p
• Kingdom Come: Deliverance II — Strong GPU limit, 72–72 fps at 1440p
• Marvel's Spider-Man 2 — Strong GPU limit, 73–73 fps at 1440p
• S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 — Strong GPU limit, 50–50 fps at 1440p
• Starfield — Strong GPU limit, 58–60 fps at 1440p

Sources for Alan Wake 2

• TechPowerUp

Full data: Alan Wake 2 benchmarks · how verdicts are computed.